by ANDY FLEMING
Rebutting a speculative hypothesis that comet
explosions changed Earth's climate sufficiently to end the Clovis culture in
North America about 13,000 years ago, Sandia lead author Mark Boslough and
researchers from 14 academic institutions assert that other explanations must
be found for the apparent disappearance.
"There's no plausible mechanism to get
airbursts over an entire continent," said Boslough, a physicist. "For
this and other reasons, we conclude that the impact hypothesis is,
unfortunately, bogus."
In a December 2012 researchers at the American Geophysical Union pointed out that no appropriately
sized impact craters from that time period have been discovered, nor have any
unambiguously "shocked" materials been found.
In addition, proposed fragmentation and
explosion mechanisms "do not conserve energy or momentum," a basic
law of physics that must be satisfied for impact-caused climate change to have
validity, the authors write.
Also absent are physics-based models that
support the impact hypothesis. Models that do exist, write the authors,
contradict the asteroid-impact hypothesizers.
The authors also charge that "several
independent researchers have been unable to reproduce reported results"
and that samples presented in support of the asteroid impact hypothesis were
later discovered by carbon dating to be contaminated with modern material.
The Boslough Trail
Boslough has a decades-long history of
successfully interpreting the effects of comet and asteroid collisions.
His credibility was on the line on in July 1994
when Eos, the widely read newsletter of the American Geophysical Union, ran a
front-page prediction by a Sandia National Laboratories team, led by Boslough,
that under certain conditions plumes from the collision of comet Shoemaker-Levy
9 with the planet Jupiter would be visible from Earth.
The Sandia team -- Boslough, Dave Crawford,
Allen Robinson and Tim Trucano -- were alone among the world's scientists in
offering that possibility.
"It was a gamble and could have been
embarrassing if we were wrong," said Boslough. "But I had been
watching while Shoemaker-Levy 9 made its way across the heavens and realized it
would be close enough to the horizon of Jupiter that the plumes would
show." His reasoning was backed by simulations from the world's first
massively parallel processing supercomputer, Sandia's Intel Paragon.
On the one hand, it was a chance to check the
new Paragon's logic against real events, a shakedown run for the defence-oriented
machine. On the other, it was a hold-your-breath prediction, a kind of Babe
Ruth moment when the Babe is reputed to have pointed to the spot in the centre
field bleachers he intended to hit the next ball. No other scientists were
willing to point the same way, partly due to previous failures in predicting
the behaviour of comets Kohoutek and Halley, and partly because most
astronomers believed the plumes would be hidden behind Jupiter's bulk.
That the plumes indeed proved visible started
Boslough on his own trajectory as a media touchstone for things asteroidal and
meteoritic.
It didn't hurt that, when he stands before
television cameras to discuss celestial impacts, his earnest manner, expressive
gestures and extra-terrestrial subject matter make him seem a combination of Carl
Sagan and Luke Skywalker, or perhaps Tom Sawyer and Indiana Jones.
Standing in jeans, work shirt and hiking boots
for the Discovery Channel at the site in Siberia where a mysterious explosion
occurred 105 years ago, or discussing it at Sandia with his supercomputer
simulations in bold colours on a big screen behind him, the rangy, 6-foot-3
Sandia researcher vividly and accurately explained why the mysterious explosion
at Tunguska that decimated hundreds of square miles of trees and whose ejected
debris was seen as far away as London most probably was caused neither by
flying saucers drunkenly ramming a hillside (a proposed hypothesis) nor by an
asteroid striking the Earth's surface, but rather by the fireball of an
asteroid airburst -- an asteroid exploding high above ground, like a nuclear
bomb, compressed to implosion as it plunged deeper into Earth's thickening,
increasingly resistive atmosphere. The governing physics, he said, was
precisely the same as for the airburst on Jupiter.
Among later triumphs, Boslough was the Sandia
component of a National Geographic team flown to the Libyan Desert to make
sense of strange yellow-green glass worn as jewellery by pharaohs in days past.
Boslough's take: It was the result of heat on desert sands from a hypervelocity
impact caused by an even bigger asteroid burst.
In the Present Case
In the Clovis case, Boslough felt that his ideas
were taken further than he could accept when other researchers claimed that the
purported demise of the Clovis civilization in North America was the result of
climate change produced by a cluster of comet fragments striking Earth.
In a widely reported press conference announcing
the Clovis comet hypothesis in 2007, proponents showed a National Geographic
animation based on one of Boslough's simulations as inspiration for their idea.
Indiana Jones-style, Boslough responded.
Confronted by apparently hard asteroid evidence, as well as a Nova documentary
and an article in the journal Science, all purportedly showing his error in
rebutting the comet hypothesis, Boslough ordered carbon dating of the major
evidence provided by the opposition: nanodiamond-bearing carbon spherules
associated with the shock of an asteroid's impact. The tests found the alleged
13,000-year-old carbon to be of very recent formation.
While this raised red flags to those already
critical of the impact hypothesis, "I never said the samples were
salted," Boslough said carefully. "I said they were
contaminated."
That find, along with irregularities reported in
the background of one member of the opposing team, was enough for Nova to
remove the entire episode from its list of science shows available for
streaming, Boslough said.
"Just because a culture changed from Clovis
to Folsom spear points didn't mean their civilization collapsed," he said.
"They probably just used another technology. It's like saying the
phonograph culture collapsed and was replaced by the iPod culture."

0 comments:
Post a Comment